Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Kotcher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ketchum Inc. Since there is interest in a possible merge, history will be left intact for that purpose. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Kotcher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing to actually suggest his own notability apart from the company itself and even then there's nothing to suggest he has inherited notability from that company; my own searches have simply found exactly what this article contains, PR....nothing convincing. SwisterTwister talk 04:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 12:08, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 12:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist Music1201 talk 16:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 16:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Ketchum Inc. I am not convinced that the person is independently notable of the company. This is probably the best source I found, but it still doesn't justify an entire article. Most other sources are press releases. At this point, I see this as a BLP1E which would be covered in the context of the company. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:16, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.