- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Prod contested without improvement to the article. Subject (presumed to be living) appears to be non-notable, with no evidence of multiple independent non-trivial reliable sources, thus failing WP:A, WP:BIO, and WP:BLP. Burntsauce 18:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep providing sources can be found and the article improved, delete otherwise. He did have a noticeable (if not particularly successful) run in the then-WWF, but the article in its current form is certainly not up to snuff. --Finngall talk 19:35, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to lack of multiple independent non-trivial reliable sources. One Night In Hackney303 00:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There are inconsistencies, for starters his real name is spelt, Ray Liachelli then at one point in the paragraph, it changes from he to she!! Further google search reveals the name correct on his onlineworldofwrestling.com profile. Next I went through a load of websites and they were all just lists, there was no real solid information for this person. Unless anyone is prepared to do some real research and add citation, as well as starting an article with his name spelt correctly, I suggest that this be delete also. Govvy 09:35, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice due to cited WP:BLP issues. The page can be recreated at a later date if verifiable sources can be identified. Yamaguchi先生 06:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'd like to point out that an unregistered user did attempt to improve the article after removing the PROD (albeit in a manner not suited to Wikipedia) but the nominator simply wiped the edits and reinstated the PROD (before being notified by a more experienced editor of the correct procedure). However, that aside I will advise Delete because of previous identity confusions regarding the article's subject due to lack of verified information. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 14:37, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.