- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:23, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ray Part 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Article is about a non-notable fan-made film. No reliable sources provided, none found. Cannot see how film meets the guideline. TNXMan 19:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unverifiable. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 20:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977Talk to meMy edits 05:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Take your pick of reasons. It's not notable, it's not verifiable, it's unsourced, it may not have even been made yet. fuzzy510 (talk) 11:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources and it's not even remotely notable Tractops (talk) 05:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If it exists, then it is a non-notable film made by non-notable producers. No verfied content, so if notability changes (unlikely) would take about one minute to re-create it as a better stub.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.