Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Victory (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - TP 15:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Victory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:ENT, and the GNG. BLP with no reliable sources or substantive biographical content; only claim of importance is quite dubiously sourced to a self-published ebook. No GNews hits, no nontrivial GBooks hits. Deleted without objection a few years ago; only addition seems to be recognition by the Urban X Awards, which by repeated AFD/DRV consensus does not make a significant contribution to notability, Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – On searching, I've also found a dearth of reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. The higher standard of WP:PORNBIO isn't met with Urban X (see prior discussions indicating a consensus to that effect: 1 – clearest explanation, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). JFHJr (㊟) 20:10, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.