- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:38, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Re-Goth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Non-notable movement, no reliable independent relevant references. Fails WP:GNG, contested prod. WWGB (talk) 11:07, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 11:14, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Appears to be an invention of the article creator. The reference doesn't mention "re-goth", and I can't find any sources that do. Fences&Windows 15:45, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.