Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReZound (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:11, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- ReZound (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Cannot find anything whatsoever about this software. Not notable. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 13:15, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Aside from a single paragraph at brighthub I'm not seeing anything in the way of reliable sources. Doesn't meet WP:NSOFT. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 03:11, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 04:25, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.