Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reading Motivation Questionnaire
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:13, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reading Motivation Questionnaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Doesn't really seem to be a notable concept. 215 non-wiki ghits, no evidence of mainstream coverage. It also turns out that the author of this article, Dduttaroy (talk · contribs) is the author of the only paper (listed in the sources section) on the subject. MER-C 09:03, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Nenyedi • (Deeds•Talk) 14:20, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete notability not established through verifiable third party sources, plus WP:COI concerns. Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 15:22, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment — I have no opinion on whether this article should be kept or deleted, but the nominator mis-categorized it as "fiction and the arts". I'm not sure which of the AfD categories it belongs in, but I'm sure it's not "fiction and the arts". —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - If it meets notability, we can fix COI. --Rocksanddirt 17:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.