Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RealWorld Icon Editor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jclemens (talk) 00:39, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RealWorld Icon Editor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DELETE. I don't believe that a one off review from CNET and a few trivial never-heard-of websites is enough to substantiate an encyclopedia article here, nor do I believe it is an indicator of notability. I am recommending deletion on the basis of this being a non-notable software product and I hope you will agree. JBsupreme (talk) 22:55, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Weakly sourced and non-notable. One of the three listed "reviews" was an advertisement and said so on the page. Some guy (talk) 21:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:54, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.