Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Canadian Natural Spring Water
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:40, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Real Canadian Natural Spring Water (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability per WP:CORP. Kelly hi! 18:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. — Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This is a private label brand sold by Loblaw Companies Limited. The brand doesn't appear to be notable, but the company that does the bottling, Ice River Springs, might be notable. Perhaps the article should be moved to Ice River Springs. Some of the information reprinted at http://www.iceriversprings.ca/news/ may be relevant. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the brand's not notable, and I don't expect that the bottler will be, either. PKT(alk) 14:28, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.