Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Realization (design)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Realization (design) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Dictionary definition of a non-notable term. Tavix (talk) 01:11, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as of right now it's only a dicdef. RockManQ (talk) 01:21, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete since it's a dictionary definition. BTW, it's been tagged for transwiki to Wiktionary. Cliff smith talk 01:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Bad dict. def. Equendil Talk 08:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, I have no idea if this is a notable term or not, but it is not a dicdef. The way I read this article, realization is a technical term for a specific process—consisting of three steps—that is used in design. If this is a notable term, there would be ample room to elaborate around the three steps, and further, how the three steps would integrate with each other, including comparisons of the 2D and 3D methods. If it is a notable term, it belongs on Wikipedia and not on Wiktionary. Sources would be nice to establish notability. Arsenikk (talk) 21:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not a technical term, it's just a word meaning "making real" that could be used in any context where a project involves making a product (and probably where management/marketing has devolved into using words such as "paradigm" and "empower" as often as possible). There is no deep meaning behind this. I am removing the transwiki tag by the way, wiktionary doesn't need bad entries. Equendil Talk 22:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- And to drive the point home, just have a look at the original version of the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Realization_(design)&oldid=232127110 Equendil Talk 22:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.