Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reamsa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:51, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reamsa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Reamsa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable company; I see plenty of these toys for sale online but haven't been able to turn up any reliable sources ~TPW 14:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Toys-related deletion discussions. ~TPW 14:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Spain. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: There is a page here(Spanish) which describes some of this company's products, but also includes biographical information on their designer which could go some way to support the article content, if it is considered a reliable source. AllyD (talk) 07:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 23:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: An unreferenced article describing a former company which produced plastic figurines (religious, Guardia Civil, etc.) during the Francoist era. The source I linked above could provide basic reference support, but is not in itself sufficient to demonstrate notability, nor is there an obvious WP:ATD redirect target. AllyD (talk) 07:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree with AllyD, there is insufficient sourcing that meets GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability of this company. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.