- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. Maxim(talk) (contributions) 18:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What gives her notability? She doesn't have any significance as a Stuff.com model, her work on off-Broadway is in very minor roles, she fails WP:BIO and doesn't seem to have any upcoming work. Irk Come in for a drink! 16:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Reby Sky is a legitimate, working model. See resume for an extensive list of credentials at: [1]
- There are thousands of legitimate working models in this country. See WP:NOTINHERITED. Irk Come in for a drink! 14:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Not with her resume. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.40.68.209 (talk) 15:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- First of all, stop saying RESPONSE:, sign your comments, and learn how to respond properly. Second of all, that's not a valid source, and even if it was, she has done very limited work to be considered a notable model. Please see WP:ILIKEIT and WP:NOTINHERITED. Irk Come in for a drink! 02:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral for now. There might be something notable about her, but the article fails to assert this or provide any citations. If nothing is added, deletion is not an unreasonable outcome. Vegaswikian 21:25, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- DONE. Links to individual credentials added on October 3, 2007 in EXTERNAL LINKS section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.40.68.209 (talk) 02:21, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.