Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 08:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Neologism, and it's written like a dictionary entry. J-ſtan^Talk_Contribs 03:51, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Neologism or protologism? Either way, Delete. Majoreditor 03:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per above (Neo or proto). - Rjd0060 04:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Move to wikitionary if you must, but that doesn't belong here. — Save_Us_229 05:21, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• De-le-te. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | 09:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually the "De" wouldn't apply. I've seen this in many Woodsball webpages. J-ſtan^Talk_Contribs 16:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete - I'd want to delete it, but if a template is transcluded on it and the page is bolded - does that not make it wanted? Rudget _zŋ 17:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.