- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein (talk) 06:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Recon Armor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable fancruft for an armor permutation in Halo 3. I believe it falls under Wikipedia is not a game guide, or possibly even speedy deletion policy A7. TH1RT3EN talk ♦ contribs 01:39, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:Notability, has no citations, and is WP:Fancruft. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:56, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and per Patar knight. Atyndall93 | talk 03:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No references provided, and fails notability. Dwilso 04:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Mergeto SPARTAN Project, where MJOLLNIR, SPARTAN-II, SPARTAN-III, etc were merged to ages ago. and the page history redirect should be renamed to Recon Armor (HALO), because Recon Armor is an ambiguous term, used in alot of fiction, and in references to light tanks. 70.55.85.177 (talk) 07:58, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There's no point to merge it to SPARTAN Project unless you plan to add a list of all armour permutations for the Spartan II to that article (which would be listcruft and quite pointless). --Patar knight - chat/contributions 15:45, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Would a redirect to either Halo 3 or SPARTAN Project be better? TH1RT3EN talk ♦ contribs 03:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge not redirect otherwise some good text could be lost. Per Th1rt3en comment above. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 12:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What good text are you referring to? TH1RT3EN talk ♦ contribs 16:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete One of the most poorly wirrten articles I've seen, does not cite referrences, use proper grammer nor spelling. There is no reason to keep it in my opinion. AP Shinobi (talk) 16:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I abhor straight deletion, but this reminds me of something funny I saw on YouTube. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 16:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - asserts no notability. WP:GAMECRUFT. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:32, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.