Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Records Management Taxonomy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. Stifle (talk) 11:33, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Records Management Taxonomy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Neologism, fails WP:Not: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Wyatt Riot (talk) 02:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - I'm loathe to just right this phrase off as a neologism per [1]. It appears to be in widespread use by various enterprises and companies. Wisdom89 (T / C) 03:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not arguing that it's uncommon in certain contexts. Wikipedia policy even admits that neologisms "may be used widely or within certain communities" but the fact remains that Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Wyatt Riot (talk) 10:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There is context beyond a simple dictionary definition. Wisdom89 (T / C) 15:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 03:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 03:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Another dubious non-notable neologism that seems to have an agenda, for it seems to have been designed to give the appearance of scientific rigour to the humble practice of records management. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:53, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - some evidence of use beyond spammers. Bearian (talk) 16:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.