Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recurring Rove sketches

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rove (TV series). No indication of notability for these sketches. Dreadstar † 17:25, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recurring Rove sketches

I redirected this, and was reverted. I have given an extension of my reasons for redirecting here—the reverting user failed to respond. I'll say it again; I see no real world assertion of notability, or no need for this to exist outside of a section in the main article. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 09:17, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect, definitely not notable enough on its own. A list of some of the most notable sketches is definitely appropriate on the main programme page, but I think that Wikipedia could get by without having unsourced information on, say, "Who's in the Swivel Chair?". Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Redirect He's barely a household name in his own household. Nick mallory (talk) 10:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Rove (TV series) not worth its own article. Atyndall93 | talk 13:51, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 18:10, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 18:12, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Rove - theres no need for a seperate page. Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 22:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as appropriate X Marx The Spot (talk) 07:25, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge whatever is relevant, and redirect. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep to big to merge also is a good list another example is Sketches from Late Night with Conan O'Brien —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.137.201 (talk) 09:56, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - there is no evidence of any reliable secondary sources for this, which also means that there is nothing appropriate to merge. Kevin (talk) 10:01, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This sort of non-notable drivel belongs on a fan site, not here. - Shiftchange (talk) 13:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.