Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recyclone (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 01:42, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recyclone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Article does not cite reliable and independent sources

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. NotAnonymous0 did I err?|Contribs 02:49, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete In the last debate, which closed as no-consensus, none of the sources cited by anyone voting "Keep" were actually reliable sources as defined by WP:RS. The only things we have on this person are a) self published or b) blogs, forums, or other self-published sites. I see nothing substantial in reliable sources to indicate they meet the minimum standards of WP:N or WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC. --Jayron32 03:10, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The news search yields nothing to do with this artist. The general search yields environmental stuff, MySpace's to other artists and bands with the Recyclone name, and products that have nothing to do with the artist. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 05:00, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.