Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recykal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. according to the keep argumentation and the sources found and assessed (non-admin closure) Old-AgedKid (talk) 12:04, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recykal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Recykal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. Also, being ranked does not necessarily imply notability. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:09, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:09, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Telangana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep WP before and the current number of reliable sources with significant coverage satisfies WP ncorp. Among these sources is a staff report by Forbes [1]; the company is on the top of Fortune and WEF lists, and another reliable link is Indian Times [2] and [3], Hindu Times and more. --Killviconiborki (talk) 14:42, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep it meets NCORP, and the article has quite good media references with in-depth and focused coverage, including niche industry eco-media and big global, for example Inc42. Gbo 65 boi (talk) 06:03, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - based on the newly cited sources and the overall notability established by multiple reliable media outlets. --Vjiralb (talk) 11:01, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.