- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted, per WP:CSD #7 "No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content)." - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 10:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- RedSQ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. No reliable sources to verify notability. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:09, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 15:54, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:46, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as A7 company. Pcap ping 08:32, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 08:32, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 08:32, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.