Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Curtain Trilogy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) HistoricalAccountings (talk) 02:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red Curtain Trilogy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Red Curtain Trilogy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable DVD release. Info available on each film's page. No need for a page of a random collection of films. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Apart from the DVD box, which indeed wouldn't justify an article, the term is widely used in publications and the press to refer to these three films, as shown by the search links above (books, news, scholar, WP refs [incl. EB], NYT). It's even subject to academic theses. I can't see an obvious REDIRECT target where this article's content could be merged. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Article is properly sourced as to why this term is used to encompass the three films; this isn't a "20 Funniest Comedies of the 90s (as defined by whatever is in the Warner Bros. library)" compilation type of cash-in, but endorsed by the man who brought the films to life (and it just isn't used to sell discs). Nate • (chatter) 04:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Current sources passes WP:BASIC. Setreis (talk) 08:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment WP:BASIC applies to people, this is a DVD set. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 03:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.