Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Deluxe Brand Development
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:40, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Red Deluxe Brand Development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:CORP. gnews reveals most coverage only in Memphis [1]. the sources in the article merely confirms it has clients. lacks indepth coverage LibStar (talk) 07:56, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don't see anything outside of PR spam. Shadowjams (talk) 08:54, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Yet another independent brand development and advertising agency. Being an ad agency, they know the value of having a Wikipedia article for search engine manipulation, so every local ad agency will try for one. No truly independent sources. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - A slick, commercial advertisement masquerading as a legitimate article. But this is no surprise since that's exactly the business of this company.--Hokeman (talk) 22:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:35, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.