Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Giant (software company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:18, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Red Giant (software company)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Red Giant (software company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. Everything is sourced to its website. Fails WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 03:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:35, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:35, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:35, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:35, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - all of the other sources I can find are product announcements and PR in the industry press. Nothing substantial and independent. Hug^syrup 12:46, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Hugsyrup. Even the publications at trusted sources like this Animation Magazine article look like press-releases. --Gprscrippers (talk) 16:49, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete looks very promotional, and no secondary sources.  Nixinova  T  C  22:39, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.