Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Roots (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:40, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Red Roots (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A big promotional love fest for this band. Has a huge list of award nominations but none are major awards. Has some blog coverage and some passing mentions but lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. (previous afd was about an unrelated band). duffbeerforme (talk) 14:06, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If the author's only claim to notability for the group is that they are the 2011 Mississippi Gospel Convention Association's Mississippi's Trio of the Year then I don't see how this even remotely meets WP:ARTIST. No charting, no major backing label, no major media coverage, nothing. §FreeRangeFrog 17:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I edited down the majority of the promotional speak, meaning that the article size is pretty much a third of what it previously was. I've removed a lot of the primary sources and otherwise non-RS links, but it does look like they've gotten a lot of local coverage from one newspaper. Of course that can be debated as to whether or not that is enough to pass WP:BAND.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 12:43, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for failing WP:MUSIC. Actually, it should be speedied as the recreation of a previously deleted article. Qworty (talk) 03:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.