Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Shift: 4 Dimensional Theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW, WP:OR. --Salix alba (talk) 23:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Red Shift: 4 Dimensional Theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Essay trying to propose an idea thought up by the article creator; it isn't an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Contested PROD. Coredesat 08:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, classic case of OR. Unless this is a Half-Life expansion pack, or something. --Dhartung | Talk 08:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOT, could be speedy. --Salix alba (talk) 10:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Tried that route, it's not a copyvio. --Coredesat 11:03, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• It can be done via WP:SNOW. --Salix alba (talk) 11:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:OR Essay. There's no place for it here. Alberon (talk) 14:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Kill, hoax/OR/bullshit. ♠PMC♠ 19:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• In hopes of speeding a WP:SNOW decision, I'll add to the chorus of deletes. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.