Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Squirrel Collective

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete both articles. Mailer Diablo 15:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created independent record label. They have thus far released one album. The article was previously tagged for deletion. The tag was removed without comment. ScottW 17:28, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added Ink to the nomination, see below comment. Friday (talk) 17:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Hmm, I admire what they're doing, but I don't see much significance here. A band with one record would not usually meet WP:MUSIC guidelines, and here's a whole label with only one record. I would lean toward delete unless verified and shown significant with third-party sources. Also relevant is Ink (band). Friday (talk) 17:36, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and also Delete (or put up as an AfD) Ink (band), as neither the record label article nor the band article assert any notability at all. -- Kicking222 17:48, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  I've turned this into a combined Afd on both articles. Seems reasonable to consider them together. Friday (talk) 17:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - as per Friday, if they can show that their stance has generated a significant degree of interest, I would change my vote to a keep but 2-3 friends of mine have their own small labels run on exactly the same basis and I wouldn't do articles about them at this time. Ac@osr 18:24, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Considering "Red Squirrel Collective" only gets 17 Google hits, and of those, only 7 are unique, and of those 7, one is WP and two are MySpace pages, I highly doubt there's much interest in the label. -- Kicking222 19:02, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Newyorktimescrossword 02:20, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.