Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red between the lines
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 03:00, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Red between the lines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Independent low-budget (in fact according the the article, no-budget) film which does not seem to have bothered any news organisations. Fails WP:MOVIE. Nancy talk 15:47, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 16:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:MOVIE on all points. Not distubuted to the public beyond a YouTube trailer, it's not historically notable, no awards, not in a national archive, not taught in schools/colleges/universities. I see no reason to believe this is notable beyond its makers. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 20:17, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:NF in as many ways as one can search. Oh, it might get a nice reception if it ever gets to a film festival... but no sourcable notability as of yet. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:36, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:MADEUP; does not fall under Wikipedia's notability standards. —Erik (talk • contrib) 00:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.