Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reda El Chaar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Hog Farm _Talk 16:27, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reda El Chaar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage, references used are either user-contributed sources or are of the business press-release genre. Fails GNG, and is probably a WP:SPIP shoo-in.

WP:BEFORE search shows little beyond the sources provided here too, which are insufficient.

Source assessment table
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Forbes middle east Press release	An obvious press release from his own company	value not understood press release	routine press release	✘ No
Registry of companies	Government list of companies	value not understood Unlikely to be faked	A list of companies of no inherent substantivity	✘ No
Forbes middle east "silent uprising"	Written by user-contributed content; no editorial oversight	user-generated content	value not understood if it were a reliable source, this may be substantial	✘ No
Arabian Business magazine	A press release style "40 under 40" fluff piece	value not understood highly contentious information, unknown editorial policies	Mentioned in a list of other people	✘ No
Coverage in Entrepeneur	Unclear who the contributors to Entrepeneur Middle East are, no published editorial guidelines, unclear if Tamara Pupic is connected or was paid for this piece	value not understood Unclear provenence of data	value not understood Might be borderline substantial if the other concerns could be met	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

BrxBrx(talk)^{(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}})} 19:59, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:05, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:05, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete The source assessment table says it all. Not enough coverage to pass WP:N. This is a personal bio, not an encyclopedia page. Ode+Joy (talk) 20:30, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Lacking in coverage which would establish notability. - Aoidh (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Source assessment tells me this fails WP:GNG. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 20:48, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NBUSINESSPERSON. Miniapolis 22:17, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think the subject is lacks WP:SIGCOV in multiple RS necessary to meet WP:GNG.Misasory (talk) 14:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NBIO, WP:NBUSINESSPERSON, WP:GNG, and the chart. Scorpions13256 (talk) 16:46, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NBUSINESSPERSON and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:07, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.