Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redemption of the Beast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Don't usually close this early but rather alot of sources have been provided and no one's objected to it being deleted so shall close as Keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 04:55, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redemption of the Beast

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason BlaccCrab (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2015 (UTC) It's an unauthorized album by an over the hill artist which did not chart on a relevant chart.[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - coverage for the album [1][2][3][4][5][6] is sufficient to pass WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS. Gongshow talk 04:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - artist's current fame is irrelevant, as is how the album was published, so long as it gets coverage per Gongshow above. Earflaps (talk) 10:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.