- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete and then redirect to List_of_Zoids#R Black Kite 00:11, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN (talk) 21:44, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No need for a separate article. Eusebeus (talk) 23:38, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Your reasoning does not explain why you chose delete over other options. - Mgm|(talk) 21:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What part of it doesn't? The nom recommended deletion and gave reasons. Eusebeus concurred with the desired outcome and the reasoning. Protonk (talk) 07:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Jay32183 (talk) 09:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 19:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect and merge to another Zoids article. Even when the heavy plot detail is removed, there's real life information left that could be discussed. - Mgm|(talk) 21:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Question How many Zoids exist? -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Over two hundred exist according to the lead in most of these. They really can't be covered outside of "This is robotic *animal* with *signature feature*." TTN (talk) 00:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to List of Zoids as per Mgm. Edward321 (talk) 01:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or redirect (or redirect after deletion). I can't see any sign of third party coverage for the search strings "Redler" and "Zoids". Since the other ones were not notable, my guess is this toy won't be either. Protonk (talk) 07:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. On of the most unknown Zoids, at least to me. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:37, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.