Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reductive-Investment Analysis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reductive-Investment Analysis

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a soapbox. The article even contains a section promoting the "author" who is presumably the editor who created the article. A google search yields no significant coverage beyond his own publications. Pontificalibus 09:13, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This content was previously deleted on 15 January 2019 under CSD as the article Fuad Akhundov/Reductive İnvestment Analysis. This is promotional and the history means that a degree of salting will be required.Britishfinance (talk) 10:08, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This information will be useful. This article talks about scientific discovery.Svetagloriya (talk), 21 January 2019

information Reductive-Investment Analysis has a right to exist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Svetagloriya (talk • contribs) 11:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC) — Svetagloriya (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Reductive-Investment Analysis is a Encyclopedic article about novelty. The article corresponds to the Wikipedia. Mcdonovan1 —Preceding undated comment added 11:43, 21 January 2019 (UTC) — Mcdonovan1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 13:14, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article text has been copied from the Introduction and Section 1 of Fuad Akhundov's self-published book, so is a WP:COPYVIO. AllyD (talk) 13:25, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

*This article Reductive-Investment Analysis is not advertising goods. This is an article about a new scientific method. Any scientific novelty is encyclopedic material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcdonovan1 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC) [reply]

No, Wikipedia has notability guidelines as to what is appropriate for inclusion. AllyD (talk) 14:25, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Even if the WP:COPYVIO text pasted from Mr Akhundov's ebook was to be entirely rewritted, the problem of notability would remain. Searches are not finding evidence that Reductive-Investment Analysis has attained notability. Fails WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 14:25, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG best I can tell, Has anyone filed a SPI on these SPAs?^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 14:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Investreport. Sock votes struck out. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:07, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment After removal of the copyright violations, the author decided to convert the remaining part of the article to a biography. We should consider if the biography can be deleted for lack of notability, too. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:50, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all as WP:NOTADVERTISING and not WP:SELFPROMOTE. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:52, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Now that the various socks have been blocked and the biographical Fuad M. Akhundov has been deleted, all that is left is for an uninvolved admin to clear away the redlink redirect and close this AfD? AllyD (talk) 13:39, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.