Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redux (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:41, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated without comment and with accidental transinclusion of first AfD from last month, by User:Elmer Clark. Re-listing, no vote.

— Adrian~enwiki (talk) 05:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No proof of notability.Wickethewok 05:37, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, seems like a vanity piece. Royboycrashfan 06:08, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless verified, notability shown. -- Krash (Talk) 06:20, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, failure to assert notability, likely reason: non-notability -ikkyu2 (talk) 07:08, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Ikkyu2's logic. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:34, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not verified, vanity article. -- Tachyon01 (Tachyon01) 07:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Tachyon01. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 09:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all above -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 10:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unverifiable, vanity. --Terence Ong 11:08, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Can't see why the last nom failed. --Krashlandon (e) 21:53, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- Hm. Obvious delete, result of last AfD was delete, why wasn't it deleted? Reyk 23:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete For the lack of notability. For the record, this appears to be unrelated to the previous "Redux" article which was deleted (see the current article's talk), although lack of notability was the problem in both cases. And my apologies about listing this wrong, I wasn't sure of the procedure in this kind of unusual case. -Elmer Clark 23:26, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to dexfenfluramine. Haikupoet 02:09, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree in theory with this redirect, but there is currently no article there. The med's off the market and will probably not be manufactured again. -ikkyu2 (talk) 21:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.