Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reel Horror

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete . Academic Challenger (talk) 18:28, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reel Horror (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film with one questionable review. PROD was removed because "Ross Hagen is notable", but notability isn't inherited. Director is notable, but is film? Donaldd23 (talk) 23:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The notability of a director does not carry over to their movies. Wes Craven and Sean S. Cunningham, who are both much more notable directors than Hagen, have films without their own Wikipedia pages. Reel Horror itself is not any more notable than The Media Madman or Time Wars, to name other Hagen films.--HawthOffHead (talk) 2:40, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete Except for the sources in the article I failed to find any other mentions about the movie. Fails notability guidelines.Less Unless (talk) 09:58, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.