Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reelium Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chor Bani Thangaat Kare. A clear preference for redirect. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:06, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reelium Films

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Reelium Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film company of questionable notability. Apparently only 1 film so far, only source is Facebook (have yet to find a reliable source online) Wgolf (talk) 23:53, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Chor Bani Thangaat Kare as {{r from company name}} plus {{r to related topic}} leaving cats intact (this could have been tried first with an explanation that it was in lieu of an AFD nom plus an inline comment requesting that it not be converted back to an article until the company met NCORP) ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 00:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect as above as the company is not independently notable at this time, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as referred above. Kaweendra (talk) 06:23, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.