- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can be recreated if the subject becomes notable due to coverage in reliable sources. Sandstein 06:28, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- RefRef (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another user was trying to nominate this but it kept misfiring for some reason. Anyway, not-notable software, still in development, no sources found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 05:47, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Any assertion of future notability of this program is a case of WP:CRYSTAL. One very brief article by slashgear titled "Anonymous may be testing a new attack tool" and a blog entry are not sufficient per WP:GNG. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 07:49, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or merge: This is software made by Anonymous, it's pretty much going to be their new LOIC, sysadmins might want to learn about this to find out if their webservers are secure, if it can't be kept, a merge with Anonymous_(group). — Preceding unsigned comment added by SalfEnergy (talk • contribs) 10:40, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was the one who tried to list nominate this. I agree completely with the reasoning of Jethrobot MadCow257 (talk) 21:46, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.