Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reflec Beat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Withdrawn by nominator. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:08, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reflec Beat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is notable, but the article has spiralled into an undue-fest of song lists and other content at best sourced to primary source (official sites) and fan wikis, I would suggest WP:TNT and a complete rewrite. Also bundling its three sequels, being no better. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 05:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC) 05:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - "Subject is notable .... I would suggest WP:TNT and a complete rewrite". You can do that by normal editing, so a deletion is not required. To help, I've bulldozed two unsourced over-detailed lists for you. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - no valid reason for deletion has been provided. AfD is not for cleanup. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:10, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw Looking back, a merger might be better here (notable enough as a series). Sorry for the trouble and thanks for the comments. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 07:46, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merger discussion started at Talk:Reflec Beat#Merger proposal. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 08:08, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.