- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - PeaceNT (talk) 05:54, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Refugee ships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Unnecessary and poorly titled article, since 3 of the 4 ships mentioned are covered in Operation Hannibal, and the 4th neither carried German refugees nor was sunk by torpedoes. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Cantent is not appropriate to title, not can I think of an appropriate title for this factette. --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Unnecessary.--Astroview120mm 02:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it seems that this title could apply to many groups of ships. If an article already cover this, this seems to be the one that should be deleted. LonelyBeacon (talk) 04:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this is a mis-titled article that duplicates Operation Hannibal, but do not salt. A legitimnate article could be writtne with this title, covering Operation Hannibal, ships taking Jewish refugees to Palestine, ships taking English children to Canada sunk by U-boats, etc. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.