Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relational presentation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:48, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relational presentation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Relational presentation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable topic. All the sources I can find are related to Robert Lane (the author of the book cited in the article), or his book. There's also a patent, which seems unrelated. After 11 years, this article is still an orphan; you'd think after all this time, somebody would have found reason to link to it if it really was a thing. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I see sources in Google books, but they appear to be for something to do with Logic, and not presentation methods. This article looks to be promotion.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.