Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relationtainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Originally proposed for deletion, but the article creator modified the wording of the prod [1]. All thought it is not clear, it could be interpreted as a contest to the deletion and there for comes to AfD. Original prod was "WP:NEO. Is a neologism, with non verified usage and only has one hit on google" and for clarity here is the google search. blue520 10:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, per nom. --soUmyaSch 11:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 11:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, protologism, dicdef and NN. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. JPD (talk) 11:20, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete 2 Ghits only--Jusjih 13:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and all above. Paddles 13:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete NEO. One Ghit in a blog doesn't remotely qualify as anything. Fan1967 14:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Google™ Avi 15:21, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.