Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relative displacement of media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relative displacement of media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is nothing more than a personal essay. It's as though somebody were given a college assignment and, instead of turning it in to the teacher, posted it here instead. Qworty (talk) 18:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unencyclopedic rambling. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 18:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Considering that the real Gerard Reid is a publisher in New Zealand (Pindar NZ), it's embarrassing that this grammar-challenged essay is being attributed to him. Whoever the author is, he does Mr. Reid no favors by using his name. Mandsford (talk) 21:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete - That first sentence killed it for me. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, close to the heart of original research. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 13:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per WP:NOR. Stifle (talk) 20:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.