Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relativity of reality
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relativity of reality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
In a nutshell: original research, non-mainstream, and draws way to heavy from one or two sources. Possibly a POV fork. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 22:12, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fringe junk. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 22:17, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as fringe self-promotion. It is a summary of an article by Bin-Guang Ma published in a non-RS source. Vsmith (talk) 23:18, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:52, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- As a major contributor, I disagree about the deletion. But, if all the others agree, there seems no reason for it to be existent. Kylin.Ma (talk) 00:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The topic is already covered in Simulated reality, this is synthesis giving undue weight to a few sources. Fences&Windows 00:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - NN fringe theory. Bearian (talk) 15:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Toss-Seems like advert for someone's fringe theories. Delete. Fuzbaby (talk) 23:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.