Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relaxation response

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Bobet 08:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

delete per WP:SPAM. The page does little to inform about Relaxation response, whatever it is. Ohconfucius 10:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete nonsense attempt at a redirect article. --Mecanismo | Talk 10:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• When the very first line of the article states that it is a disambiguation stub that is in need of fixing, nominating the article for deletion is not the way to fix it. Keep. Uncle G 12:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The rewrite seems pretty good to me. --Wafulz 15:24, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, dab page. Charles Matthews 16:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Sleep - Samsara (talk • contribs) 22:49, 24 August 2006 (UTC) chrrr[reply]
• Remove Linkspam for Eli Bay --Xrblsnggt 02:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're talking about the wrong article. The page being discussed is relaxation response. If you feel spam on other pages should be removed, please be bold! - Samsara (talk • contribs) 07:40, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • No, if you look at the "Relaxation Response Institute" disambiguation link on this page, it goes to the Eli Bay article. --Xrblsnggt 02:49, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.