Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relevance (information retrieval)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance (information retrieval) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This article is subsumed by other entries--primarily by the Information_retrieval entry. Moreover, it is poorly written and has POV issues. If there is anything worth salvaging, I suggest it be merged into the Information_retrieval entry.

Dtunkelang (talk) 02:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• keep immense amount of material available. I've added some of it. One of the basic concepts in a major subject. Books have been written about it specifically, and a few hundred articles. A bit of checking in GS would have found them. DGG (talk) 07:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Notable topic, as shown by DGG's references. Klausness (talk) 14:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Klausness. Stifle (talk) 19:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.