Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious correct
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's a poorly-formed neologism, with no clear use. Phronima 12:06, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. --Phronima 12:06, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete barely comprehensible. Just zis Guy you know? 12:25, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not-notable neologism. --Xorox 12:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect into Political correctness, although they already have a religious correctness section. Is still a neologism and doesn't have the backing that PC has to be on its own. Should still redirect though, not delete. Someone searching for this term will really get what they want on PC. Ansell 14:15, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete protologism. I couldn't find any evidence this term has ever been used outside of this article.--Isotope23 16:19, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, do not redirect, but feel free to make a redirect from Religious correctness. Mangojuice 17:19, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Heh, ok, Religious correctness already existed, and was a copy of this same article by the same creator. I changed that one into a redirect. Still say delete this one. Mangojuice 17:21, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- As the only person who hasn't said delete so far, I would not have minded if you had redirected the other way, infact, it seems more formal than religious correct. In the end I would not mind if both were redirected into Political Correctness. After all WP is not paper, redirects are free, why not use them. Ansell 01:13, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Someone else changed it to a redirect to Religious correct; I had redirected it to Politically correct. If this gets kept, then I agree, it should be kept at Religious correctness rather than Religious correct. Mangojuice 14:30, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- As the only person who hasn't said delete so far, I would not have minded if you had redirected the other way, infact, it seems more formal than religious correct. In the end I would not mind if both were redirected into Political Correctness. After all WP is not paper, redirects are free, why not use them. Ansell 01:13, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Heh, ok, Religious correctness already existed, and was a copy of this same article by the same creator. I changed that one into a redirect. Still say delete this one. Mangojuice 17:21, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I would be inclined to keep it and clean it up as a daughter article of politically correct. Could work as a redirect, too, I suppose. —Cuiviénen, Friday, 14 April 2006 @ 04:10 (UTC)
- Delete, nn neologism. Sandstein 10:06, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.