- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 19:39, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Remcom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable extremely minor software company GrapedApe (talk) 02:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless better sources come to light. I found a bit of coverage that is apparently press-release driven here. But overall I get the feeling that while the company's XFDTD product might make an argument for notability based upon the publications that reference it, the company itself seems to lack coverage in RS. Celtechm (talk) 05:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Celtechm above, the product XFDTD appears to be somewhat noteworthy, and there might be enough information to establish notability; there is a significant lack for the company itself. Tiggerjay (talk) 06:21, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.