- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 01:43, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Renfue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This band fails--at least for now--to meet the inclusion guidelines. An article on the topic was speedied a number of times in 2009 and 2010, ultimately being userfied. It was then deleted at an MfD discussion. The citations are inadequate to establish notability, and I was unable to find any sources establishing notability. Bongomatic 23:29, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable band. Keb25 (talk) 15:38, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This is an unsigned band that has only had some local coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 19:34, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This band has not even been signed, and the article provides no indication of notability.--Martin IIIa (talk) 22:48, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.