- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Rennicks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nomination. Article was prodded by HighKing (talk · contribs) but a prod on this article was contested in September June 2008, thereby making the article ineligible for prod. Prod rationale this time around was "No additions have been made since last prod in June 2008. No indication of notability. Many claims unreferenced"
I am neutral. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:43, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as proxied nominator. --HighKing (talk) 15:57, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it is the major part of Fitzwilton. Or merge it into the FW page.Red Hurley (talk) 11:52, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.