- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 10:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Reor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete. Unreferenced neologism, author removed prod tag. Fails WP:GNG. WWGB (talk) 13:41, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 13:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, speedily if possible. —Angr 14:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the nom. — Jake Wartenberg 14:31, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Speedy and PROD were both attempted, but were removed. Wikipedia is not for things made up in one day in 2005/6 or for non-notable neologisms. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 16:23, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Cnilep (talk) 16:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Is not notable in anyway. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 17:31, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --aktsu (t / c) 05:07, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.