Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reorg Compression

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TravellingCari 03:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reorg Compression (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Notability and Verifiability in question. Typing "Reorg Compression pandya" in Google and Google News yields six unrelated hits and zero hits respectively. I cannot also verify online the existence of any of Pandya's papers that focus on organizational chaos on Google Scholar.--Lenticel ^(talk) 01:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - source given doesn't link to anywhere. Fails WP:V and WP:N; term itself could possibly be a neologism. Also, complete gibberish; basically the article itself has numerous problems. RockManQ (talk) 01:31, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not notable. The existence of provided book reference cannot be verified (zero hits on Google) and indeed Google searches about the subject in general don't produce much either. Han-Kwang (t) 15:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.