- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:39, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This software appears to fail WP:CORP. No independent sources are given, and none have been added since last November (or even longer). Google gives a lot of hits, but mostly for shop or download sites. Clear evidence of notability is lacking. Also note that employees of the manufacturer have edited the article (cf. talk page). PROD was contested in November 2006. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 14:41, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable. CO2 15:54, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no indication that it passes WP:CORP. Concerns were raised a year ago, and no expansion has taken place. --Elonka 21:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Strongly fails WP:CORP. Bfigura (talk) 22:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- Gavin Collins 10:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable; delete. • Lawrence Cohen 17:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is non notable software and no discernible improvements have taken place regarding this article in recent months. --Stormbay 21:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not pass WP:CORP or any other related guideline. Burntsauce 23:33, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.