- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spellcast (talk) 21:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Reportbug-ng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Non notable software. No reliable sources offered or available. The software it is a alternative for is not notable enough for its own page Nuttah (talk) 18:12, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- fr33kman -s- 19:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: not notable enough for its own. Alexius08 (talk) 04:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No claim of notability. Bongomatic (talk) 05:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.